Despite his highly influential and significant academic career, Chomsky is today best known for his political views and activism. He is generally considered an American political dissident because his views so strongly contradict the perspectives put forward by our American media and political organizations. Again, Professor Chomsky’s political writings and other contributions cover a large territory of issues ranging from insights into and criticisms of war and media manipulation to encouraging new forms of social structures. Some of his key political ideas include:
· A strongly critical view of the United State’s aggressive foreign policy. Chomsky is especially talented at pointing out the hypocrisy of the U.S. claim that it supports international democracy and is anti-terrorism – demonstrating how it actually – simultaneously destroys democracies, encourages repression, and both overtly and covertly contributes to many of the worst terrorist acts in the world. Though this perspective is alien and extremely disturbing to most U.S. citizens, professor Chomsky is frighteningly skillfully and very thorough at demonstrating the validity of this point of view.
· That the mass media (whether television, radio, or print, etc.) in the United States is almost entirely a propaganda tool of the U.S. government and in turn the U.S. and International corporations that control it. This phenomena was explored in depth in one of Chomsky’s best known books Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media.
· He opposes censorship and strongly supports freedom of speech.
· Strongly opposes the so called U.S. war on drugs, emphasizing that it is actually only a “war on certain drugs” and is really more a means of social and class-race control. He further points out that the real key to solving the problem lays in education and prevention rather than the highly destructive and largely ineffective military and police approach that has been in effect.
· Critical and very cautious of capitalism and of American big business-type capitalism in particular. But also very critical of Leninist types of socialism which also tend to be very repressive.
· A strongly antiwar but not necessarily completely pacifist perspective. Chomsky was very strongly critical of the Vietnam War and other wars that the U.S. has overtly or covertly participated in during the last half century. Even when a war may be ‘justified’ he feels that good diplomacy can usually be used as a preventative to conditions reaching that level.
In general Professor Chomsky’s political and ideal social views could be labeled as ‘traditional anarchist’. He’s described himself as a fan of both libertarian socialism and anarcho-syndicalism and supports progressive Unions such as the International Workers of the World. Okay, what does that all mean? – Well, to be lazy and quote Wikipedia:
‘Libertarian socialism is a group of political philosophies that aim to create a society without political, economic or social hierarchies – a society in which all violent or coercive institutions would be dissolved, and in their place every person would have free, equal access to tools of information and production, or a society in which such coercive institutions and hierarchies were drastically reduced in scope.[1]
‘ This equality and freedom would be achieved through the abolition of authoritarian institutions and private property,[2] in order that direct control of the means of production and resources will be gained by the working class[3]’
&
‘Anarcho-syndicalism(can be seen as a specific form of Libertarian socialism, and) is a branch of anarchismlabor movement.[47] Anarcho-syndicalists view labor unions as a potential force for revolutionary social change, replacing capitalism and the State with a new society democratically self-managed by workers.’
&
‘The Industrial Workers of the World (IWW or the Wobblies) is an international union
(that) … contends that all workers should be united within a single union as a class and that the wage system should be abolished. They may be best known for the Wobbly Shop model of workplace democracy, in which workers elect recallable delegates, and other norms of grassroots democracy (self-management) are implemented.’ and society as a whole. Libertarian socialism also constitutes a tendency of thought that informs the identification, criticism and practical dismantling of illegitimate authority in all aspects of social life. Accordingly libertarian socialists believe that “the exercise of power in any institutionalized form – whether economic, political, religious, or sexual – brutalizes both the wielder of power and the one over whom it is exercised.”
– I know it all sounds like a bunch of hippy idealism – but I have to say that I’ve seen such philosophies and organizations do some pretty amazing things here in my hometown of Portland, Oregon.